Avaya vs 3CX – Comparing features and costs to help you choose

Two popular business communicstions options for UK businesses are Avaya and 3CX. Both companies offer robust communication solutions, but they differ in features, pricing, and deployment options. This detailed analysis will help you understand the differences between Avaya vs 3CX, guiding you in choosing the most suitable system for your business.

Compare prices

Avaya vs 3CX

CategoryAvaya3CX
Target audienceMedium to large enterprisesSmall to medium-sized businesses (SMEs)
Unified communicationsComprehensive UC with voice, video, messaging, and collaboration toolsUC features with voice, video, chat, and collaboration tools, suitable for SMEs
Deployment optionsOn-premises, cloud, hybridOn-premises, cloud, or hosted by 3CX
Video conferencingAvaya Spaces – high-quality video with advanced collaboration featuresIncluded with all plans – HD video, but fewer advanced features than Avaya
Hardware requirementsRequires proprietary Avaya hardwareCompatible with third-party SIP devices, softphones, and mobile apps
ScalabilityHighly scalable – suitable for large enterprisesScalable for SMEs and mid-sized businesses
IntegrationsIntegrates with CRM, ERP, and other business systemsIntegrates with basic CRM systems, less comprehensive than Avaya
AI and analyticsAdvanced AI-powered analytics and customer insightsBasic call reporting and analytics
Contact centre solutionsCustomisable solutions for multi-channel customer supportLimited call centre features compared to Avaya
Setup and managementMore complex setup – may require IT expertiseEasy setup and management with user-friendly interface
Licensing modelPer user, based on deployment type (on-premises, cloud, hybrid)Subscription-based with pricing tiers based on number of users
PricingHigher cost, especially for enterprise-level deploymentsLower cost – more budget-friendly for SMEs
Ongoing costsHigh – proprietary hardware and advanced feature maintenance can be costlyMinimal ongoing costs, especially for cloud deployments
Best forLarge organisations with complex communication needsSmall to mid-sized businesses looking for cost-effective, flexible solutions
Avaya vs 3CX

Overview of Avaya

Avaya is a well-established player in the telecommunications space, with a reputation for delivering high-end solutions for businesses of all sizes. Avaya specialises in unified communications (UC), contact centre solutions, and cloud-based services. Avaya’s products are typically deployed in larger organisations and enterprise settings, though they also provide scalable solutions for SMEs.

Key features of Avaya

  • Unified communications: Avaya’s platforms offer integrated voice, video, messaging, and collaboration tools, all accessible from one interface.
  • Customisable contact centre solutions: Avaya offers tailored solutions for customer service teams, integrating call routing, AI-powered analytics, and multi-channel communications.
  • On-premises and cloud deployment: Avaya provides the flexibility to deploy solutions on-premises, in the cloud, or via a hybrid model, catering to businesses with specific security or infrastructure needs.
  • Extensive hardware options: Avaya offers a range of IP desk phones, conference phones, and other hardware solutions, which can be integrated seamlessly with its software.
  • Scalability and integration: Avaya’s systems are known for their ability to integrate with other business systems, offering easy scalability for growing businesses.

Overview of 3CX

3CX is a software-based communication solution that is particularly popular among small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the UK. It is known for its cost-effectiveness and flexibility, offering a feature-rich IP PBX system that can be deployed on-premises, hosted on the cloud, or run on your existing server infrastructure.

Key features of 3CX

  • VoIP and video conferencing: 3CX offers a robust VoIP phone system, integrated with video conferencing tools, which can replace traditional phone lines entirely.
  • Software-based solution: 3CX eliminates the need for costly proprietary hardware, offering compatibility with various third-party devices such as SIP desk phones, softphones, and mobile apps.
  • Unified communications: Like Avaya, 3CX provides unified communications features, including chat, file sharing, presence, and more, accessible from any device.
  • Easy setup and management: 3CX is known for its user-friendly interface and ease of setup, making it accessible for businesses without extensive IT departments.
  • Flexible deployment: 3CX offers multiple deployment options – on-premises, in the cloud, or hosted by 3CX itself – giving businesses the freedom to choose the most suitable solution.
  • Affordable licensing model: 3CX operates on a subscription-based licensing model that is significantly more affordable than many of its competitors.

Comparing features – Avaya vs 3CX

1. Unified communications

  • Avaya: Avaya excels in providing comprehensive UC features, including advanced collaboration tools for both internal and external communications. Its solutions are geared toward larger teams and organisations that need robust, scalable communication systems.
  • 3CX: While 3CX also offers unified communications, its feature set is more tailored to SMEs. It includes voice, video, chat, and collaboration tools, but may lack some of the more advanced analytics and AI-driven features seen in Avaya.

2. Deployment options

  • Avaya: Offers on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployment models. Avaya’s hybrid option is particularly suited for businesses that require a combination of cloud flexibility and on-premises control.
  • 3CX: Provides similar flexibility with on-premises, cloud, or hosted deployment. However, 3CX’s cloud solutions are typically more cost-effective for SMEs, especially those without existing server infrastructure.

3. Hardware and compatibility

  • Avaya: Avaya has a comprehensive range of proprietary hardware, including desk phones, conference phones, and headsets. While this offers seamless integration, it can also increase the overall cost of deployment.
  • 3CX: One of 3CX’s biggest advantages is its compatibility with third-party hardware, including a wide range of SIP phones. This gives businesses the flexibility to use existing hardware, reducing costs.

4. Scalability and integrations

  • Avaya: Avaya is known for its scalability, making it ideal for large enterprises with complex communication needs. It also integrates easily with other business systems such as CRM and ERP platforms.
  • 3CX: 3CX is highly scalable for SMEs and mid-sized companies, but may not offer the same level of advanced integrations as Avaya in larger, more complex environments.

5. Video conferencing

  • Avaya: Avaya Spaces is the company’s video conferencing and collaboration tool, offering high-quality video, chat, file sharing, and more. It is an excellent solution for businesses that rely heavily on remote meetings.
  • 3CX: 3CX includes video conferencing as part of its standard package, with no additional costs, making it a strong contender for SMEs looking for an all-in-one solution. The platform supports HD video calls, but it may not have the same level of advanced features as Avaya Spaces.

Comparing costs – Avaya vs 3CX

1. Licensing

  • Avaya: Avaya’s pricing model is typically based on the size of the organisation and the specific features required. It offers flexible pricing for on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployments, but generally tends to be more expensive than 3CX, particularly for SMEs.
  • 3CX: 3CX operates on a subscription model, with pricing tiers based on the number of users and the deployment option (on-premises or cloud). For SMEs, 3CX is much more cost-effective, as the licensing fees are lower, and it does not require proprietary hardware.

2. Hardware costs

  • Avaya: Businesses that choose Avaya will need to invest in Avaya’s proprietary hardware, which can add to the overall costs. However, for larger enterprises that need a comprehensive, integrated system, this investment may be worthwhile.
  • 3CX: With 3CX, businesses can use existing SIP-compatible hardware or invest in affordable third-party devices. This reduces initial setup costs, making 3CX an appealing choice for budget-conscious SMEs.

3. Ongoing costs

  • Avaya: The ongoing costs of maintaining an Avaya system can be higher, especially for businesses with large-scale deployments or those requiring advanced features such as AI-powered analytics or multi-site communication.
  • 3CX: 3CX has minimal ongoing costs, particularly for cloud-hosted solutions. Businesses benefit from lower subscription fees and reduced hardware expenses, making it a cost-effective long-term choice.

Which should you choose?

Choose Avaya if:

  • You are a large enterprise or growing business that requires advanced unified communications features.
  • You prefer a solution with integrated proprietary hardware and comprehensive contact centre features.
  • Your business needs high levels of scalability, with options to integrate advanced analytics and AI.

Choose 3CX if:

  • You are a small to medium-sized business looking for a cost-effective, easy-to-manage communication system.
  • You want the flexibility of using third-party hardware to reduce initial setup costs.
  • You need a solution that includes video conferencing and VoIP features without additional expenses.

Conclusion

Choosing between Avaya vs 3CX ultimately depends on the size of your business, your budget, and your specific communication needs. Avaya offers more advanced features and is ideal for larger organisations with complex requirements, while 3CX provides an affordable, feature-rich solution tailored to SMEs.

FAQ

Which is more affordable, Avaya or 3CX?

3CX is generally more affordable than Avaya, especially for small and medium-sized businesses. Avaya tends to be more expensive due to proprietary hardware requirements and advanced features, making it a better fit for larger enterprises with higher budgets.

Which offers better scalability, Avaya or 3CX?

Both systems are scalable, but Avaya is better suited for larger enterprises requiring complex infrastructure. 3CX is ideal for small to medium businesses, with easy scalability options that don’t demand high-end hardware or extensive IT support.

Which system is easier to set up, Avaya or 3CX?

3CX is easier to set up, with a user-friendly interface and compatibility with third-party hardware. Avaya systems tend to be more complex, often requiring professional installation and ongoing IT management, making them less accessible for smaller businesses.

Which offers better unified communications features, Avaya or 3CX?

Avaya offers more advanced unified communications features, including sophisticated collaboration tools and AI-powered analytics. 3CX provides solid UC features like voice, video, chat, and collaboration, but it may lack the advanced integrations and analytics available with Avaya.

Can 3CX match Avaya in contact centre capabilities?

No, 3CX is limited in contact centre features compared to Avaya. Avaya specialises in offering customisable, multi-channel contact centre solutions with advanced routing, AI-powered insights, and analytics, making it a superior choice for businesses focused on customer service.

Which platform supports more hardware flexibility, Avaya or 3CX?

3CX offers greater hardware flexibility, supporting a wide range of third-party SIP phones, softphones, and mobile devices. Avaya requires the use of its proprietary hardware, which can increase costs but ensures seamless integration with its software.

Which platform is better for cloud deployment, Avaya or 3CX?

Both platforms support cloud deployment, but 3CX is typically more cost-effective and straightforward for businesses seeking cloud-based communications. Avaya’s cloud solutions are more feature-rich but come with higher complexity and cost, making them suitable for larger businesses.

Which platform is better for video conferencing, Avaya or 3CX?

Avaya Spaces offers a more advanced video conferencing experience with better collaboration tools. 3CX includes video conferencing as part of its standard package, but it may not provide the same level of quality or features as Avaya, especially for large-scale meetings.

Which has lower ongoing costs, Avaya or 3CX?

3CX generally has lower ongoing costs due to its use of third-party hardware and lower licensing fees. Avaya, with its proprietary hardware and advanced features, tends to have higher ongoing maintenance and subscription costs, particularly for enterprise-level users.

Which is better for large enterprises, Avaya or 3CX?

Avaya is better suited for large enterprises, offering advanced unified communications, scalability, and contact centre solutions. 3CX, while capable of supporting medium-sized businesses, is more geared towards smaller operations, making it less suitable for complex, large-scale environments.

Compare Prices ⓘ